The personal dimension of collective bargaining in the gig-economy: who and for whom



The personal dimension of collective bargaining in the gig-economy: who and for whom
File:Racknitz - The Turk 3.jpg1st transnational seminar
WU Vienna University of Economics and Business
5-6 June 2019

Programme
Wednesday, 5 June
10:00 Opening session
1.     Official welcome
2.     Presentation of the Project: José María Miranda Boto, University of Santiago de Compostela/Elisabeth Brameshuber, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business/Christophe Teissier, ASTREES
3.     The personal dimension of collective bargaining in the gig-economy: who and for whom: Elisabeth Brameshuber, Vienna University of Economics and Business
11:30 Coffee break
12:00 Supranational sources
Chair: Franz Marhold, Vienna University of Economics and Business
1.     European Union (Tamás Gyulavári, Pázmány Péter Catholic University Budapest)
2.     Council of Europe (Barbara Kresal, University of Ljubljana, European Committee of Social Rights at the Council of Europe)
3.     International Labour Organization (Hannah Johnston, ILO)
13:30 Lunch
14:30 Old actors and new agents
Chair: Marie-Cécile Escande Varniol, CERCRID, Université Lumière Lyon 2
1.     Old actors in new roles: classical trade unions and 4.0 labour market (Felicia Rosioru, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai)
2.     New agents for workers’ representation in the gig economy (Kübra Doğan Yenisey, Istanbul Bilgi University)
3.     The “other one”: new forms of undertakings Odile Chagny (economist, researcher at IRES (French TU research institute), co founder and coordinator of the Sharers and Workers network)
16:00 Coffee break
16:30 Which actions for whom?
Chair: Yolanda Maneiro Vázquez, University of Santiago de Compostela
1.     The regulatory dilemma in the gig economy: law, collective agreements or case law? (Piera Loi, University of Cagliari)
2.     The meaning of “Crowdworking” – (Luca Ratti, University of Luxembourg)
3.     Industrial action: an empirical approach (Zane Rasnača, ETUI)


Thursday, 6 June
9:30    Roundtables – national examples of collective bargaining for workers in the gig-economy
Chair: José María Miranda Boto, University of Santiago de Compostela
France – Cécile Nicod
Italy – Carla Spinellil (University of Bari)
UK – Nicola Countouris

Chair: Gábor Kártyás, Pázmány Péter Catholic University Budapest
Netherlands – Nicola Gundt
Poland – Lukasz Pisarczyk
Spain – Daniel Pérez del Prado

11:00 Coffee break

11:30 Roundtable – Austrian stakeholders

Chair: Elisabeth Brameshuber
Rolf Gleißner, WKO (Austrian Chamber of Commerce)
Thomas Moldaschl, vida (Union for the transport and services professions)
Artur Schreiber, CEO foodora/mjam
Oliver Stauber, founder of Vidaflex and partner at Stadler Völkel Rechtsanwälte

13:00 Lunch

14:30 Roundtable – International stakeholders

Chair: Christophe Teissier, ASTREES
Fabian Ferrari, Oxford Internet Institute
Ignacio Doreste, ETUC
Nicola Quondamatteo, Bologna Riders’ Charter-activist (tbc)


16:00 Coffee break
16:30 – Outlook: Content of collective bargaining in the gig-economy
1.     The risk of void: alternative sources of protection for gig workers. Social security vs. Collective rights. (Judith Brockmann, University of Hamburg)
2.     Which contents for gig economy collective bargaining? Jenny Julén Votinius, Lund University
Concluding remarks:            José María Miranda Boto, University of Santiago de Compostela/Elisabeth Brameshuber, Vienna University of Economics and Business

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Collective agreement Between Hilfr ApS. CBR.no.: 37297267 and 3F Private Service, Hotel and Restaurant Translation by the Danish Confederation of Trade Unions

§ 1 Scope  Scope for the work performed The collective agreement covers cleaning assistants who perform cleaning work in private households facilitated by the digital platform Hilfr ApS. (hereinafter Hilfr). The collective agreement covers cleaning assistants who are employees, not freelancers. Personal scope Freelancers automatically obtain employee status after 100 hours’ work via the platform and are subsequently covered by this collective agreement. Early transfer to the collective agreement Freelancers who wish to transfer their status from freelancer to employee before having worked 100 hours must notify Hilfr of this. In this case, the collective agreement will cover new work assignments agreed after the time of notification. Hilfr reserves the right to reject a request for early transfer based on factual and objective criteria. Freelancers Freelancers who wish to remain freelancers after 100 hours’ work facilitated by the platform must inform Hilfr of this decision well i
Read more

COGENS main findings

    COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND THE GIG ECONOMY:  NEW PERSPECTIVES SUMMARY [1]   I.              GENERAL FRAMEWORK A variety of situations Gig economy is a latent issue, and its regulation is extremely diverse in the Member States of the European Union. This is particularly true for collective bargaining in this field. The variety of legal traditions regarding collective bargaining in the Member States is reflected by the variety of the Member States’ approaches towards (not) regulating collective bargaining for persons working in the gig economy. C ollective bargaining cannot be the single source of regulation in the gig economy, but must be complementary, to a smaller or larger extent, to statutory law. It is clear that constant communication between the different levels of regulation not only at national level, but also between European and national levels is required. The role of public authorities, not necessarily through legislation, is of utmost importance in many coun
Read more

KOLEKTIVNÍ VYJEDNÁVÁNÍ A ZAKÁZKOVÁ EKONOMIKA: NOVÉ PERSPEKTIVY SOUHRNNÁ ZPRÁVA

[1]   I.              Obecný rámec R ůzné situace Zakázková ekonomika (Gig economy) je latentním problémem a její regulace se mezi členskými státy Evropské unie nesmírně liší. Zvláště to platí pro kolektivní vyjednávání v tomto oboru. Odráží se v tom rozmanitost tradičních právních přístupů týkajících se kolektivního vyjednávání v členských státech vůči regulaci nebo ne-regulaci kolektivního vyjednávání osob pracujících v zakázkové ekonomice. Kolektivní vyjednávání nemůže být jediným zdrojem regulace zakázkové ekonomiky, nýbrž se musí ve větší či menší míře doplňovat s právními předpisy. Je jasné, že je zapotřebí, aby probíhala neustálá komunikace mezi různými regulatorními úrovněmi nejen na národní úrovni, ale také mezi evropskou úrovní a národními úrovněmi. Role veřejné správy, nikoliv nutně uplatňovaná prostřednictvím legislativy, je v mnoha zemích vrcholně důležitá a na místech jako italská Bologna se už hledají nové způsoby přes vypracování místní Charty. Hodnotíme-li
Read more