Jornada: Tribunales Supremos y plataformas

 TRIBUNALES SUPREMOS Y EL TRABAJO EN PLATAFORMAS

La reciente sentencia de la Sala IV del Tribunal Supremo, de 23 de septiembre de 2020, ha traído la atención sobre el hecho de que el estatuto jurídico de los trabajadores en plataformas está siendo fijado por decisiones de los más altos órganos jurisdiccionales en varios países de nuestro entorno. Esta jornada busca presentar ese panorama jurisdiccional, comparando las sentencias más recientes del Tribunal de Justicia y los Tribunales Supremos de Francia, Italia y España. 

Puede seguirse de forma presencial en el Salón de Grados de la Facultad de Derecho (máximo 42 personas) o a través de MS Teams. En ambos casos, es necesaria la inscripción, gratuita, a través de https://forms.gle/wQ3n68yGaaqHvtUN7 . 

Los datos personales que se requieren para la participación presencial obedecen al Protocolo Covid-19 de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Esta jornada se enmarca en las actividades de los proyectos de investigación RTI2018- 097917-B-100, “Retos del Derecho del Trabajo Español ante la Doctrina del Tribunal de Justicia en materia de Política Social y Derechos Fundamentales”, y COGENS - Collective Bargaining and the Gig Economy: New Perspectives - VS/2019/0084. Asimismo, también forma parte de las actividades del grupo de  investigación “Empresa y Administración”, GRUPO DE REFERENCIA COMPETIVA (ED431C 2019/15) del programa de consolidación y estructuración de unidades de investigación competitivas en las universidades del sistema universitario de Galicia, así como de la red universitaria “empresa y administración” (ED531 D-2017/19), del programa de consolidación y estructuración de unidades de investigación competitivas de la Xunta de Galicia.



PROGRAMA

12:00 Inauguración

12:05 Las decisiones del Tribunal de Justicia

“Elite Taxi y Uber France: la importancia de la aplicación”.

Yolanda Maneiro Vázquez, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela

“También hay autónomos: el auto Yodel”.

José María Miranda Boto, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela

12:30 Francia e Italia

“La sentencia de 24 de enero de 2020 de la Corte Suprema di Cassazione,

sobre Foodora”.

Piera Loi, Università di Cagliari

“La sentencia de 4 de marzo de 2020 de la Cour de Cassation, sobre Uber

France”.

Marie-Cécile Escande-Varniol, Université Lumière Lyon II

13:00 España

“La sentencia de 23 de septiembre de 2020, sobre Glovo”.

Lidia Gil Otero, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Rubén Ranz Martín, coordinador de Tu Respuesta Sindical YA (UGT)

13:30 Fin de la sesión

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Collective agreement Between Hilfr ApS. CBR.no.: 37297267 and 3F Private Service, Hotel and Restaurant Translation by the Danish Confederation of Trade Unions

§ 1 Scope  Scope for the work performed The collective agreement covers cleaning assistants who perform cleaning work in private households facilitated by the digital platform Hilfr ApS. (hereinafter Hilfr). The collective agreement covers cleaning assistants who are employees, not freelancers. Personal scope Freelancers automatically obtain employee status after 100 hours’ work via the platform and are subsequently covered by this collective agreement. Early transfer to the collective agreement Freelancers who wish to transfer their status from freelancer to employee before having worked 100 hours must notify Hilfr of this. In this case, the collective agreement will cover new work assignments agreed after the time of notification. Hilfr reserves the right to reject a request for early transfer based on factual and objective criteria. Freelancers Freelancers who wish to remain freelancers after 100 hours’ work facilitated by the platform must inform Hilfr of this decision well i
Read more

Short summary of the COGENS action

This Project follows the path of previous research by the INLACRIS team. Since its first works in 2010, the approach has changed to a great extent. The traditional structures of collective bargaining have been decisively affected by the crisis, as well as important features of the labour market. The current scenario can be described as a never-before perceived evasion of labour law, where traditional structures are eroding. The challenges labour law is facing right now due to the gig-economy, digitalization and the erosion of the employment contract promise to be severe and long-lasting. The main proposal of this project is a deeper look into collective bargaining as possible instrument to tackle the problems arising from the changes in the standard employment relationship.  In 2014, President Juncker declared in his Political Guidelines: “The social market economy can only work if there is social dialogue. Social dialogue suffered during the crisis years. Now it must be resumed
Read more

COGENS main findings

    COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND THE GIG ECONOMY:  NEW PERSPECTIVES SUMMARY [1]   I.              GENERAL FRAMEWORK A variety of situations Gig economy is a latent issue, and its regulation is extremely diverse in the Member States of the European Union. This is particularly true for collective bargaining in this field. The variety of legal traditions regarding collective bargaining in the Member States is reflected by the variety of the Member States’ approaches towards (not) regulating collective bargaining for persons working in the gig economy. C ollective bargaining cannot be the single source of regulation in the gig economy, but must be complementary, to a smaller or larger extent, to statutory law. It is clear that constant communication between the different levels of regulation not only at national level, but also between European and national levels is required. The role of public authorities, not necessarily through legislation, is of utmost importance in many coun
Read more